criminal liability in English

esponsibility for illegal actions

Use "criminal liability" in a sentence

1. The minimum age of criminal liability in Armenia is 16.

2. Amnesties are measures that seek to remove criminal liability for wrongdoing

3. Title 17-A, §57 Criminal liability for conduct of another; Accomplices

4. Application or revocation of my notary public commission and possible criminal liability

5. Accountability and civil and criminal liability are essential elements of public service status.

6. Both civil and criminal liability are incurred by the corrupt giving or receiving of such commission.

7. The expressed intent of immunity legislation is to encourage reporting without fear of civil or criminal liability.

8. Statutes of 181871 and 1875 were designed to relieve trade unions of criminal liability, especially for conspiracy.

9. The general grounds for immunity from criminal liability, e.g. absence of substantive illegality, still apply to those circumstances.

10. The general grounds for immunity from criminal liability, e.g. absence of substantive illegality, still apply to those circumstances

11. Criminal liability for accomplices arises from section 25 (2) StGB; for abettors from sections 26 and 27 StGB.

12. Urlaeva should be placed in a psychiatric institution and absolved her of criminal liability in the light of the diagnosis.

13. 29 One reason for this may be a desire to protect from criminal liability men whose conduct is not universally regarded as criminal.

14. Automatism is an excuse defense against criminal liability for defendants who committed a presumptively criminal act in a state of unconsciousness, semiconsciousness, or unawareness

15. Automatism is an excuse defense against criminal liability for defendants who committed a presumptively criminal act in a state of unconsciousness, semiconsciousness, or unawareness

16. Article # of the CC (Complicity and types of accomplices) imposes criminal liability on accomplices in any intentional criminal act such as perpetrators, organizers, aiders and abetters

17. Article 24 of the CC (Complicity and types of accomplices) imposes criminal liability on accomplices in any intentional criminal act such as perpetrators, organizers, aiders and abetters.

18. The Afft may be distinctive among foreign franchise laws in imposing serious criminal liability (up to five years in jail) for failing to provide a disclosure document.

19. If an act of terrorism has been completed or attempted, the abettor to such a crime, who assisted the offender, particularly by “procuring” the means for its commission, bears criminal liability pursuant to Article 10, sub-paragraph 1 (c).

20. After describing the concept and role of Complicity in the law, I argue that much of the motivation for presenting Complicity as a separate basis of criminal liability is misplaced; paradigmatic cases of Complicity can be assimilated into standard causation-based accounts of

21. The organizers, instigators or abetters of an offence incur criminal liability under the article that establishes the penalty for the offence committed, read in conjunction with article 33 of the Criminal Code, except in cases where they were simultaneously co-perpetrators of the offence.

22. If the organizer of the crime, the abettor or helper voluntarily refuse from committing an act of crime, they are not subject to criminal liability, provided this person informed the state bodies or through other means and prevented the completion of the crime by the perpetrator.

23. Complicity is a theory of criminal liability, a method by which a defendant is convicted of an offense actually committed by someone else.1 0 Although accomplice liability is not itself a separate crime, the prosecution must prove an actus reus and mens reajust like in any criminal trial

24. A person who is not the perpetrator of an offence, as specifically referred to in the relevant article of the special section of the Criminal Code, but who has participated in the commission of the offence referred to in such article, incurs criminal liability for the offence as an organizer, instigator or abetter.

25. Judges must determine whether the requirements for granting extradition have been met, such as the existence of dual criminal liability and a minimum penalty, as well as the requirement, on the part of the courts in Chile, unlike in other countries, that the record should show prima facie evidence that the person whose extradition is being sought committed the crimes of which he or she is accused as principal, accomplice or accessory

26. The norms of the Part # of the new Criminal Code and particularly Article # also establish criminal liability for the accessories to a crime: an organizer (a person who organized or led the perpetration of felony as well as established or led a gang or criminal association), an instigator (a person who incited another person to perpetrate a felony by persuasion, financial incentive, threat or otherwise) and an abettor (a person who assisted by advice, instruction, offering an information, resources or tools, eliminating obstacles, had previously promised to conceal the offender, means or tools, traces of felony, to conceal, purchase or vend the items obtained through felony

27. The norms of the Part 7 of the new Criminal Code and particularly Article 38 also establish criminal liability for the accessories to a crime: an organizer (a person who organized or led the perpetration of felony as well as established or led a gang or criminal association), an instigator (a person who incited another person to perpetrate a felony by persuasion, financial incentive, threat or otherwise) and an abettor (a person who assisted by advice, instruction, offering an information, resources or tools, eliminating obstacles, had previously promised to conceal the offender, means or tools, traces of felony, to conceal, purchase or vend the items obtained through felony).