appellants in English
In the event, no evidence was given by the complainant or the appellant about these matters.
Use "appellants" in a sentence
1. Heirs of Hubert Burat (buras), et al.,plaintiffs-appellants, Janet Easterling and Jackburas, Movants-appellants, v
2. Browet, Inc., et al, Appellants
3. The Court of Appeal upheld the appellants' convic-tions.
4. Bowman argued the cause for Appellees/cross-appellants
5. Soon thereafter, appellants sued Appellees for breach of contract and fraud
6. (i) Briefs in a Case Involving Multiple Appellants or Appellees
7. In the alternative, the appellants claimed partial remission of the customs duties.
8. The third ground of appeal: absence of an advantage granted to the appellants
9. The selection board's conduct and demeanour adversely affected the appellants' presentations and thereby affected the scoring.
10. Synonyms for Beseechers include suppliants, petitioners, supplicants, pleaders, suitors, appellants, applicants, beggars, solicitors and claimants
11. Either the appellants or the Appellees may request to make oral arguments before the court
12. In any event, the Commission maintains that the appellants’ grounds set out above are unfounded.
13. Neither the appellants nor the authorities should be able to choose the appeal body. d.
14. The department’s representative stated that the department agreed with the argument advanced by the appellants.
15. The judge then went on to ask if there was an affidavit from the appellants.
16. Having launched the action, he sought a Mareva injunction restraining the appellants from dealing with the property.
17. Thereupon the appellants changed their pleas to guilty of unlawful possession and were convicted and sentenced.
18. However, he acknowledged that the e-mail sent to the appellants could have stated this more clearly.
19. However, it refused each time to order the appellants’ provisional release from prison, although Greek law provides for that.
20. Lipper was on the brief for amici curiae Non-Governmental Organizations in support of Appellees/cross-appellants.
21. Some of that evidence, it might be said in parenthesis, appears to be adverse to the appellants.
22. In Global Witness’s story, it seems obvious that Exxon was the briber, Appellants were the Bribees, and the trade was
23. Their procedures should be made more intelligible and appellants need more support and help in putting their cases.
24. Board of Education, et al., Defendants-Appellees,new York State Education Department, et al., Defendants-appellants, 669 F.2d 865 (2d Cir
25. 64. The second part of the appellants' single plea, even if it were admissible, must therefore also be rejected on the merits.
26. In Global Witness’s story, it seems obvious that Exxon was the briber, Appellants were the Bribees, and the trade was $35,000 to ensure the deal goes through
27. Someone who appeals for a legal or official decision to be changed: The jury acquitted the Appellants on the conspiracy as it was originally charged
28. Appellants sought, among other things, to recover the amount they claimed Rey loaned Appellees for the business, the promised but unpaid portion of the business's profits since
29. Such disclosure must be made to the appellants, at the latest, by the close of the business day (4:30 p.m. PDT) on Thursday, April 24, 2003.
30. 103 In the fourth place, the appellants claim that the assertion, unaccompanied by any evidence in that regard, that the provision of abortions through funding from the EU budget reduces abortions is manifestly paradoxical.
31. The appellants argue that since the IRISL-related criterion expressly named IRISL and was thus an ad hominem criterion directly concerning the latter, the Council was under an obligation to inform them of its intended amendments.
32. In a case involving more than one appellant or appellee, including consolidated cases, any number of appellants or Appellees may join in a brief, and any party may adopt by reference a part of another’s brief
33. Furthermore, the appellants challenge the 1998 Guidelines, whose lawfulness they call into question because the Commission was allegedly not competent to adopt them (see below, section a) and those Guidelines were applied retroactively here (see below, section b).
34. She contended that the department failed to provide answers to her questions and instead issued an admendment on August 16th, 2004 (exhibit A-2(1)) and changed the rationale to appoint Ms. Lafleur to an indeterminate position (exhibits A-3 and A-2-1) and also changed the experience qualifications and the language qualifications on the right of appeal notice (exhibits D-6 and D-7) . [23] For these reasons, the appellants’ representative concluded, the selection process was defective and the appellants’ allegations should be allowed.
35. Translations in context of "aggrieve" in English-French from Reverso Context: To interpret the phrase "Aggrieves or may aggrieve" in the manner urged by the appellants would run counter to the legislature's clear intention to provide redress for grievances not legally cognizable.
36. Luthra, P. [5] With respect to the appellants, Ms. Candussi noted that appellant Gilroy had applied for the Positions and she had received a failing rating of two marks out of ten against the second sub-factor listed under the Abilites/Skills qualification.
37. Contrary to what the appellants claim, the fact that that operation is simply more difficult to implement or even less profitable without the restriction concerned cannot be deemed to give that restriction the ‘objective necessity’ required in order for it to be classified as ancillary.
38. ‘Two Bearer shares were allocated to Hemery and then transferred to trusts of which the two appellants and Baber were settlors.’ ‘Regardless of the evidence, the lottery ticket is a Bearer note, which means whoever turns in a valid ticket is legally entitled to the winnings, end of story.’
39. ‘Two Bearer shares were allocated to Hemery and then transferred to trusts of which the two appellants and Baber were settlors.’ ‘Regardless of the evidence, the lottery ticket is a Bearer note, which means whoever turns in a valid ticket is legally entitled to the winnings, end of story.’
40. The appellants contended that the Selection Board failed to adhere to the timeframes for the conduct of the GCT test, failed to utilize a stop watch or accurate timepiece as prescribed in the test procedures and did not adhere to the requirements for non-admittance of late candidates.
41. First, the appellants submit that since the criterion relating to the link with IRISL expressly named that entity, it had to be considered an ad hominem criterion, so that the Council was under an obligation to inform them of the amendments it envisaged making and to enable them to submit their observations.
42. 75 Next, in respect of the complaint by which the appellants seek to demonstrate the insufficient or contradictory nature of the General Court’s reasoning and the error of law which that court is accused of having committed in the grounds of the judgment under appeal in relation to the rejection of the evidence submitted by the appellants to demonstrate the commercial and operational independence of GQ in relation to RQ, it should be noted that, in paragraph 74 of the judgment under appeal, the General Court did not examine that evidence in detail, but rejected the arguments of those companies by mere reference to the aforecited case-law in the judgment under appeal.
43. ‘Ealing however Contend that this simply reflects the position under the old statutory instrument.’ ‘He wants to Contend that because that was again an argument not put to the Court of Appeal or to the judge.’ ‘In their grounds of appeal the appellants Contend that the trial judge was wrong to rule as he did.’
44. Concerning the 5th allegation, the appellants' representative stated that, as he already had noted in the context of presenting other allegations, in the instances of certain candidates some of the "must possess' adjectival words in the list of the reference check questionnaire regarding "Effective Interpersonal Relationships" (PS1) were not circled by the referee, yet the final mark was still 100%.
45. That word, in its sense of ‘allocating a sum for a particular purpose’, would mean, here, that the situation prohibited by the provision occurs on the mere payment of benefits to the appellants (who will use them for the benefit of their husbands), regardless of whether the adverbs ‘directly or indirectly’ refer, as well as to the verb ‘make available to’, to the verb ‘make available for the benefit of’.
46. 61 As to the remainder, in so far as the arguments set out in paragraphs 50 to 52 of the present judgment allege an error of law with regard to the assessment of the question whether MasterCard is an association of undertakings, it should be noted that, contrary to the Commission’s contention, the appellants are not, in essence, merely challenging the assessment of the facts made at first instance, but are relying, for the main part, on questions of law which are admissible at the appeal stage.